FORECASTING GROUNDWATER BASIN DATA USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS

Authors

  • Dadajonova Zilola Botirjon kizi Assistant, Tashkent University of Information Technologies named after Muhammad al-Khwarizmi, Head of the Department of Scientific Research and Technology Transfer, Incubation and Acceleration
  • Makhmudjanov Sarvar Ulugbekovich Associate Professor, Tashkent University of Information Technologies named after Muhammad al-Khwarizmi
  • Nurmurodov Javohir Nurmurod ugli Tashkent University of Information Technologies named after Muhammad al-Khwarizmi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69891/

Keywords:

groundwater artificial intelligence forecasting hydrogeological data machine learning monitoring data analysis

Abstract

This article thoroughly examines the issues of forecasting groundwater basin data using artificial intelligence models. The study investigates methods for analyzing groundwater data and identifying future changes based on hydrogeological and hydrodynamic indicators. The use of artificial intelligence models, particularly advanced architectures such as Transformer, LSTM, and GRU, makes it possible to identify complex relationships between hydrogeological processes and significantly improve the accuracy of forecasting results. These models are capable of accounting for both long-term and short-term dynamic changes, including seasonal cycles, anthropogenic impacts, and delayed chains of 'precipitation-runoff-water level-hydrochemical composition'. The research findings can be applied in groundwater resource monitoring, effective management of water resources, prevention of environmental problems, and the improvement of decision-making systems. Furthermore, the joint application of various artificial intelligence models and the integration of data from multiple sources is advisable in the future to enhance the reliability of forecasting results.

References

Haykin S. Neural Networks and Learning Machines. — 3rd ed. — New York: Pearson Education, 2009. — pp. 1–936.

Goodfellow I., Bengio Y., Courville A. Deep Learning. — Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016. — pp. 1–775.

Bishop C.M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. — New York: Springer, 2006. — pp. 1–738.

Russell S., Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. — 4th ed. — Pearson Education, 2021. — pp. 1–1168.

Géron A. Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras and TensorFlow. — Sebastopol: O'Reilly Media, 2022. — pp. 1–851.

Chollet F. Deep Learning with Python. — New York: Manning Publications, 2021. — pp. 1–504.

Han J., Kamber M., Pei J. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. — Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann, 2011. — pp. 1–703.

Z.B. Dadajonova, B.D. Abdullaev, N. Zaynidinov, B.B. Akbaraliev, B.R. Nasibov. Intellectual processing of hydrogeological data (using the example of groundwater) // British Journal of Global Ecology and Sustainable Development. — 2024.— Vol. 32. — pp. 1–8.

Dadajonova Z.B., Abdullayev B.D., Nasibov B.R., Dadajonov B.B. Monitoring of changes in groundwater quality in irrigated lands of Kashkadarya region // Bulletin of the University of Geological Sciences. — 2024. — No. 2. — pp. 1–8.

Dadajonova Z.B., Nurmurodov J.N. Classification of deposits with underground resources using artificial intelligence technologies // Al-Fargʻoniy avlodlari electronic scientific journal. — 2025. — Vol. 1. — Issue 2.

Dadajonova Z.B. Predicting groundwater level changes using an artificial intelligence model // Scientific article. — 2026.

Zaynidinov H.N., Qobilov S.Sh. A two-dimensional hydrogeological data modeling program based on a spline model independent of nodes. — 2024.

Aggarwal C.C. Neural Networks and Deep Learning. — Cham: Springer, 2018. — pp. 1–497.

Murphy K.P. Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective. — Cambridge: MIT Press, 2012. — pp. 1–1067.

Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning. — New York: Springer, 2009. — pp. 1–745.

Maier H.R., Jain A., Dandy G.C., Sudheer K.P. Methods used for the development of neural networks for the prediction of water resource variables // Environmental Modelling & Software. — 2010. — Vol. 25. — No. 8. — pp. 891–909.

ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology. Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology // Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. — 2000. — Vol. 5. — No. 2. — pp. 115–123.

Kratzert F., Klotz D., Brenner C., Schulz K., Herrnegger M. Rainfall-runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory networks // Hydrology and Earth System Sciences. — 2018. — Vol. 22. — pp. 6005–6022.

Shalev-Shwartz S., Ben-David S. Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. — pp. 1–410.

Abbot M.B., Refsgaard J.C. Distributed Hydrological Modelling. — Dordrecht: Springer, 1996. — pp. 1–336.

Ian H.W., Eibe F., Hall M.A. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. — Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann, 2016. — pp. 1–654.

Kelleher J.D., Tierney B. Data Science. — Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018. — pp. 1–280.

LeCun Y., Bengio Y., Hinton G. Deep Learning // Nature. — 2015. — Vol. 521. — pp. 436–444.

Schmidhuber J. Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overview // Neural Networks. — 2015. — Vol. 61. — pp. 85–117.

Hochreiter S., Schmidhuber J. Long Short-Term Memory // Neural Computation. — 1997. — Vol. 9. — No. 8. — pp. 1735–1780.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-22

How to Cite

FORECASTING GROUNDWATER BASIN DATA USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS. (2026). Universal International Scientific Journal, 3(6), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.69891/