MATEMATIKA TA’LIMIDA IRT METODOLOGIYASI VA KOGNITIV MISKONSEPSIYALAR DIAGNOSTIKASI: PSIXOMETRIK TAHLIL VA KOGNITIV INTERVENSIYA
Kalit so‘zlar:
matematik miskonsepsiyalar, IRT metodologiyasi, 2PL modeli, kognitiv diagnostik baholash, PISA, TIMSS, Propensity Score Matching, kognitiv konfliktAbstrak
Ushbu maqolada 7-9-sinf matematika ta’limida o‘quvchilarning kognitiv miskonsepsiyalarini aniqlash va diagnostika qilishda Item Response Theory (IRT) metodologiyasining psixometrik asoslari tahlil qilinadi. O‘zbekistonning PISA-2022 va TIMSS-2023 natijalari asosida “fikrlash” kognitiv domenidagi past ko‘rsatkichlar miskonsepsiyalar bilan bog‘liq ekanligi asoslanadi. Maqolada 1PL, 2PL va 3PL modellarining qiyosiy tahlili, kognitiv diagnostik baholash (CDA) va Q-matritsa yondashuvining imkoniyatlari, shuningdek, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) va kognitiv intervensiya strategiyalari (“kognitiv konflikt”) yoritilgan. Keltirilgan tahlillar matematik tayyorgarlikdagi tizimli bo‘shliqlarni aniqlash va ularni bartaraf etishga qaratilgan intervensiya dasturlarini ishlab chiqish uchun metodologik asosdir.
References
OECD. PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. - Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019.
Mullis I. V. S., Martin M. O. (Eds.). TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks. - Boston: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, 2017.
Ojose B. Common Misconceptions in Mathematics: Strategies to Correct Them. - Lanham: University Press of America, 2015.
Sheffield L. J., Cruikshank D. E. Teaching and Learning Mathematics: A Guide to Research. - New York: Routledge, 2015.
Gierl M. J., Haladyna T. M. (Eds.). Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment for Education. - Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Piaget J. Piaget’s theory // Carmichael’s Manual of Child Psychology. - 3rd ed. - New York: Wiley, 1970. - Vol. 1. - P. 703-732.
Anderson J. R. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. - 5th ed. - Worth Publishers, 2000.
Rasch G. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. - Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Educational Research, 1960.
Hambleton R. K., Swaminathan H. Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. - Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, 1985.
Embretson S. E., Reise S. P. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. - Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000.
Baker F. B. The Basics of Item Response Theory. - 2nd ed. - College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, 2001.
Kolen M. J., Brennan R. L. Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking. - 3rd ed. - New York: Springer, 2014.
Bock R. D., Aitkin M. Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm // Psychometrika. - 1981. - Vol. 46, No. 4. - P. 443-459.
DeMars C. Item Response Theory. - Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Rizopoulos D. ltm: An R package for latent variable modelling and item response theory analyses // Journal of Statistical Software. - 2006. - Vol. 17, No. 5. - P. 1-25.
Anderson L. W., Krathwohl D. R. (Eds.). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. - New York: Longman, 2001.
Rosenbaum P. R., Rubin D. B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects // Biometrika. - 1983. - Vol. 70, No. 1. - P. 41-55.
Austin P. C. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies // Multivariate Behavioral Research. - 2011. - Vol. 46, No. 3. - P. 399-424.
Crocker L., Algina J. Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. - New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1986.
Yuldashev Q. H. Matematik savodxonlikni baholashning zamonaviy metodlari. - Toshkent: Fan, 2018.
Identifying and dealing with student errors in the mathematics classroom. - PMC, 2022. - Article ID: 9798414.
(+998)90 142-39-38
Andijon viloyati, Marhamat tumani, Qashqar ko’chasi 189-uy