BAHOLASHDA AI: AVTOMATLANGAN BAHOLASH TIZIMLARI, ULARNING CHEKLASHLARI VA FORMATIV VA SUMMATIV BAHOLASHGA INTEGRATSIYA.

Mualliflar

  • Isoyeva Begim Lecturer of Journalism and Mass Communications University of Uzbekistan

Kalit so‘zlar:

sun'iy intellekt, baholash, avtomatlashtirilgan baholash tizimlari, mashina o'rganish, tabiiy tilni qayta ishlash (NLP), formativ baholash, summativ baholash, o'quvchilarning fikr-mulohazalari, standartlashtirilgan test.

Abstrak

Sun'iy intellektning (AI) jadal rivojlanishi turli sohalarga, jumladan, ta'limga sezilarli ta'sir ko'rsatdi. Ushbu sohada sun'iy intellektning eng o'zgaruvchan ilovalaridan biri bu avtomatlashtirilgan baholash tizimlarini ishlab chiqishdir. Ushbu tizimlar talabalar faoliyatini samarali, aniq va adolatli baholash uchun mashinani o'rganish (ML) va tabiiy tilni qayta ishlash (NLP) dan foydalanadi. Baholash jarayonini avtomatlashtirish orqali sunʼiy intellektga asoslangan tizimlar oʻqituvchilarning ish yukini yengillashtiradi, oʻquvchilarga oʻz vaqtida fikr-mulohazalarini taqdim etadi va umumiy baholash jarayonini yaxshilaydi. Bundan tashqari, ular o'rganish naqshlarini aniqlash va shaxsiy tavsiyalar berish uchun keng ko'lamli ma'lumotlarni tahlil qilish imkonini beradi. Biroq, afzalliklariga qaramay, sun'iy intellektga asoslangan baholash tizimlari bir qator qiyinchiliklarga duch keladi, jumladan, AI algoritmlaridagi noto'g'riliklar, yangi pedagogik usullarga moslashmaslik va ma'lumotlarning maxfiyligi va adolatliligi bilan bog'liq axloqiy tashvishlar. Ushbu maqolada AIning avtomatlashtirilgan baholashdagi o‘rni, uning afzalliklari, cheklovlari va axloqiy jihatlari o‘rganiladi va ta’lim natijalarini yaxshilash uchun AIni ham formativ, ham summativ baholashga integratsiyalash strategiyalari muhokama qilinadi.

References

References:

Isoeva, B. A. (2024) DIALOGIC TEACHING AS A FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT TOOL. International Conference on Advance Research in Humanities, Sciences and Education. Confrencea, 1(1), 42–44.

Keynes, S. (2024). Transcript: Rethinking the AI Boom, with Daron Acemoğlu. Retrieved from Financial Times

Khasanova, G. (2023). Problem-based learning technology. Journal of Pedagogical Inventions and Practices, 19, 137-139.

Khasanova, G. K. (2023). ASSESSMENT CRITERIA OF ORGANIZATIONAL-MANAGERIAL COMPETENCES OF MASTER'S STUDENTS. Oriental renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences, 3(22), 24-29.

LifeWire. (2024). The Surprising Ways AI Is Being Used in Schools Right Now. Retrieved from LifeWire

National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE). (2013). NCTE Position Statement on Machine Scoring. Retrieved from NCTE

Perelman, L. (2012). Construct Validity, Length, Score, and Time in Holistically Graded Writing Assessments: The Case against Automated Essay Scoring (AES). Retrieved from WAC Clearinghouse

The Guardian. (2024). Voice from the Past: How One University Is Countering AI with Ancient Examination Techniques. Retrieved from The Guardian

Wikipedia Contributors. (2023). Automated Essay Scoring. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from Wikipedia

Downloads

Nashr qilingan

2025-05-22

How to Cite

BAHOLASHDA AI: AVTOMATLANGAN BAHOLASH TIZIMLARI, ULARNING CHEKLASHLARI VA FORMATIV VA SUMMATIV BAHOLASHGA INTEGRATSIYA. (2025). Universal Xalqaro Ilmiy Jurnal, 2(4.2), 78-81. https://universaljurnal.uz/index.php/jurnal/article/view/2012